Please see Latest additions and updates below.

Do we want our Wild Coast to look like this …
Current dune mining operations on the KZN coast near Richards Bay

… or like this …
Current dune mining operations on the KZN coast near Richards Bay

… or like THIS?
Unspoilt Beaches on the Wild  Coast :Ntafufu River Mouth -Photo GvL

“From a conservation point of view the Pondoland Wild Coast must rank as one of the most important areas for biodiversity, both in South African and internationally. But it is not as yet adequately protected from threats such as mining.” Keith Cooper.

Bittu Saghal amongst India’s foremost conservationists and editor of India’s most prestigious wild life magazine, “Sanctuary” :

” To put it simply, India has decided to sell its family jewels to some of the most predatory financial forces in the world. Thus Orissa’s water-stocked forests and turtle-populated seas are hostage to iron ore companies; Gujarat’s pristine coastline is being pillaged by petroleum interests; Andhra Pradesh’s thick forests are being mined for uranium; Karnataka’s Western Ghats are under assault by dam builders; Madhya Pradesh’s tigers are being forced to retreat before invading industrialists; and fragile Himalayan glaciers, together with earth ice everywhere, are in advanced stages of melt.”

So - South Africa did not sell St Lucia, but will our decision-makers sell our own national treasure, the Pondoland Wild Coast?

Read more …
http://www.swc.org.za/own_uploads/bateleurs_special_edition-Apr07.htm


Latest additions and updates on our site:

The SA National Roads Agency faces paying compensation of R50-million if it destroys a section of a forest to make way for the proposed N2 Wild Coast toll road.

“The provision of penalties for the destruction of natural forests is stipulated in a national policy drawn up by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. The policy outlaws the development of eco-estates – such as Zimbali Lodge, on the KwaZulu-Natal coastline – in natural forests.” …… read more (sourced from: http://www.timeslive.co.za)


The AmaMpondo People: Human Rights & Development in the Wild Coast, South Africa By Sunny Morrison

The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples has existed for 3 years. It was adopted on September 13, 2007 by the UN General Assembly following more than twenty years of discussion within the UN system on the topic. As outlined in the preamble to the document, indigenous people are among the most impoverished, marginalized and victimized people in the world. I undertook research for a Master of Sciences degree in the Wild Coast South Africa in 2007, and the idea of the AmaMpondo representing an indigenous people valued for their unique cultural and historical value was not an idea that had currency at that time. However, since recently the AmaMpondo people have been officially recognized by the United Nations as having a culture and a tradition which is of great intrinsic cultural value.

The development battlefield of the Wild Coast is approaching its most important legal battles to be fought, since in the upcoming months of 2010 some important decisions will be made which will have lasting implications for the rural communities of the Wild Coast. The AmamPondo are an indigenous people, and this is only being recognized as of late according to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and this development can help to achieve the objective of improving the situation of local communities in the Wild Coast and in the long term too the situation of indigenous peoples the world over.

“Indigenous peoples have the right to selfdetermination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.” (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Article 3) Sustaining the Wild Coast is a section 21 NGO working with a loose network of organizations and individuals who are concerned about bringing about development which is ecologically sound, equitable, respects indigenous AmaMpondo communities as well as their local histories and cultures and brings benefit directly to the local people. SWC wishes to disseminate and receive information, ideas, and opinions about the development predicament in which they are situated and establish practical collaborative programmes demonstrating ways out of this predicament. This situation comprises the fact that the South African Pondoland Wild Coast, a Local indigenous AmaMpondo communities have systematically had their human rights infringed upon due to these development plans by means of inequitable governance processes, intimidation and silencing alternative views on development throughout the exploratory and planning phases of mining in recent years. SWC takes their lead from local rural AmaMpondo communities and is united with them by a concern to prevent the undermining and displacement of those local communities, their livelihoods and their life worlds.

There have been serious shortcomings in the approaches employed to engage with local indigenous communities and a ‘top down’ method of project development which has entailed that the government’s proposals for projects like the mining occurs with no or insufficient consultation with communities leading to projects which are radically out of step with indigenous communities observations and needs. SWC is concerned that the proposed mining and road developments focus on bringing about a type of economic growth which favours capital accumulation by an elite minority of interest groups which stand to benefit from the construction of the mine and road which will occur at the expense of the AmaMpondo indigenous communities who have historical and cultural ties with the land.

This call for attention is supported by the experience of the AmaMpondo of having been systematically impeded in exercising their democratic right to resist the imposition of a development trajectory which brings about unacceptable inequities in land and resource distribution, leading to the benefit of a privileged few, degradation of irreplaceable unique biodiversity and ecosystem functions and values as well as marginalisation and displacement of indigenous and local communities. SWC is not opposed to all development, it is opposed only to inequitable and unsustainable development and supports any initiatives to develop environmentally sustainable, community-based, environmentally sound economic activities in the region.

If you would like to contribute to NGO Sustaining the Wild Coast whether it be by joining the mailing list, conducting research, financial donation or any other means please do not hesitate to contact Val Payn, Communications co- coordinator, Sustaining the Wild Coast Campaign. Email: swcoastval@gmail.com

extract from: NetWURK E-Magazine


Nature’s Pharmacy by African Renaissance Productions

Nature’s Pharmacy is produced by African Renaissance Productions for STEPS and SANBI as part of the Caretakers series.

http://www.vimeo.com/12582565


New N2 plaza toll gets stiff opposition

13 May 2010, 09:11
Strong opposition to a new toll plaza at Isipingo began to coalesce last night when the eThekwini council and business in Durban announced plans to fight the proposed N2 Wild Coast Toll Road through a legal appeals process.

The Durban Chamber of Commerce and Industry, representing more than 3 500 companies, signalled its intention to “pull out all the stops” to block the Isipingo portion of the controversial toll road.

Municipal manager Mike Sutcliffe also confirmed that the city would lodge an appeal following an executive committee meeting this week where councillors reaffirmed a resolution taken in 2002 to oppose any more toll roads within the city’s boundaries.

Quoting from a report submitted to the committee, Sutcliffe said there had been 8 000 objections to the toll road during the environmental impact assessment process and it was clear that proposed mitigation measures from the government would not address the negative impact of tolls on the Durban economy.

A recent report from the municipality notes that 350 000 people live in the southern part of the city and many would be adversely affected by the Isipingo plaza.

The report estimates there are about 57 000 work trips through the Isipingo area during the morning peak. About 70 percent of these trips were via public transport and about 30 percent by private cars.

The Durban chamber also called an urgent meeting yesterday afternoon to decide whether to submit a legal appeal against the recent decision to grant environmental approval for the project.

Members were warned that the deadline to file appeals expires next week.

Chamber president Clive Manci said he would continue to lobby senior government officials, though some members complained that the government appeared to be deaf to numerous protests raised so far.

Manci said it was clear that the trend to establish new toll roads in Durban and other parts of the province would raise the cost of doing business.

It is understood that several chamber members, under the umbrella of the South Durban Basin Business Coalition, have already prepared a separate legal appeal against the toll plaza.

Act fast

Attorney Glendyr Nel, who chairs the chamber’s environmental committee, warned that it was essential for members to take a decision soon.

“The May 19 deadline is just around the corner, so we need to act fast to prepare a properly considered legal appeal.”

Amar Sooklal, of the chamber’s economic development committee, said an economic assessment by transport consultant Gavin Maasdorp had highlighted several adverse impacts from the proposed toll plaza.

Manci said there seemed to be a presumption that Durban businesses would absorb further cost hikes like toll fees.

“The reality is that we can’t afford further increases in production costs.”

Members would decide swiftly on whether to align the chamber with other groups lodging appeals, or to lodge a separate appeal to lend strength to the appeals process.

It is understood that environmental and social groups under the umbrella of Sustaining the Wild Coast are also finalising an appeal, along with South Durban residents and commuters under the banner of the Upper South Coast Anti-Toll Focus Group.

The KwaZulu-Natal legislature is also opposed to the Isipingo plaza, but it was not clear last night whether the premier, Zweli Mkhize, would lodge an appeal.

This article was originally published on page 1 of The Mercury on May 13, 2010


Wild Coast sand-dune mining decision halted again

February 09, 2010 Edition 1

Tony Carnie

THE decision on whether to allow sand-dune mining near Xolobeni on the Wild Coast has been put on hold again.

The Minerals and Mining Board was due to hear evidence for and against the mining application in Durban yesterday, but the meeting was postponed to a date still to be finalised.

The Congress of Traditional Leaders of SA president and MP, Nkosi Phathekile Holomisa, who was to chair the hearing and hear legal argument, said committee members had not had sufficient opportunity to study the substantial volume of documentation on the matter and a decision was taken to reconvene at a later date.

Journalists were refused entry to the meeting room yesterday and told the hearing was an internal meeting.

They were later advised that the meeting had been postponed.

The application to mine in the environmentally sensitive Xolobeni area, south of the Wild Coast Casino, had been made by the Australian-based company Transworld Energy, a local subsidiary company Mineral Resources (SA) and the shareholder group Xolobeni Empowerment Company.

The application was approved by the Minerals Department in 2008 but was put on hold shortly afterwards following appeals by a number of groups, including the Amadiba Crisis Committee.

The committee has complained that residents of the area were not consulted properly.


New Wild Coast mine hearings to be held February 03, 2010 Edition 1

Tony Carnie

A NEW round of hearings begins in Durban next week to debate controversial plans for dune mining at Xolobeni on the Wild Coast.

Part of the mining venture by an Australian company and local empowerment groups was approved in August 2008, but was put on hold after strong opposition from Xolobeni residents and traditional leaders, who said they had not been properly consulted.

The Legal Resources Centre, which is acting for members of the Amadiba crisis committee, also threatened to challenge the approval process in court.

Now legal advisers for the Mineral Resources Department have confirmed that supporters and opponents of the mining plan would be given the chance to air their views to a panel, which would make final representations to Minerals Minister Susan Shabangu.

The hearing would be held from February 8-10 at 333 Durban Bay House in Anton Lembede (Smith) Street.

It is understood that senior advocate Gilbert Marcus and Legal Resources Centre attorney Sarah Sephton would represent members of the Amadiba crisis committee.

The original mining proposal, by the Perth-based Transworld Energy group, involved removing heavy minerals from a 22km strip of coast immediately south of the Wild Coast Sun casino.

Although Xolobeni is in the Eastern Cape, members of the Amadiba crisis committee requested that hearings be held in Durban.


THE PONDO REVOLT

“Since the declaration of the State of Emergency throughout East
Pondoland, there has been an almost complete news black-out on this
troubled area.”

Read Full Story