NEW TOLL ROAD EIA ‘Rank with double standards’

PRESS RELEASE – January 14 2009

NEW TOLL ROAD EIA ‘Rank with double standards’

With the deadline for public comments for the Wild Coast Toll road looming on 22 January, Sustaining the Wild Coast (SWC), has condemned the new EIA as ‘still saddled with dealing with the problems of an extensive infrastructure proposal that was developed and promulgated in a manner that was anything but objective and independent’.

In its comment on the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), SWC argues that the foundations of the proposal are fundamentally flawed because the SANRAL preferred route was developed as an isolated and unsolicited bid by a consortium of private bidding companies whose primary motivation was profit, rather than arising out of an integrated and comprehensive regional development plan. As the basic premises of the proposal remain unchanged, many of the fundamental concerns that were raised by the public in 2003 have still not been addressed.

SWC lists numerous public and legal concerns that were raised in the 2004 Appeal Review which the new EIA has failed to address. These include unrealistic mitigation measures given the current capacity of local government structures in the Eastern Cape Province; that by excluding the tolling process from the EIA a bias is created in socio-economic impact assessments and that it is still not certain that tolls will be affordable for poor communities, that the need for a Toll road and for a route through the Pondoland Centre of Plant Endemism (an internationally recognized ‘hotspot’ of plant endemism) are still not adequately justified, that the precautionary principle has not been applied, and that public participation processes are still not in compliance of NEMA.
The Appeal Review was commissioned in 2004 by the new Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Minister van Schalkwyk, in response to the large number of public appeals petitioning against the Record of Decision (ROD) made in December 2003 which had approved the N2 Wild Coast Toll Road Environmental Impact Assessment of 2003.
The SWC EIA commentary states that the EIA is ‘rank with double standards’.


Deadline for public comments N2 toll road

Hi SWC Supporters

A reminder that the deadline for public comments on the new N2 Wild Coast Toll road EIAis 22 January, to be sent to:-

Theo Hansford, NMA Effective Socail Strategists (pty) Ltd. Box 32097,
Braamfontein, 2017.fax 086 601 0381 email theoh@nma.org.za

I have received a number of requests to provide some guidelines for people who would like to send in comments in support of SWC principles. I ‘ve compiled the following (attached) for your use. Please adapt or adjust it however you see fit.
You can delete anything you don’t personally agree with, or feel free to add any of your own comments that you feel it does not cover, or are more suitable for your own circumstances. You’re also welcome to ‘personalize’ the wording in whatever way you like. However, if you would like to send it exactly as it is, then I suggest you include a ‘provisio’ along the lines of:-

We/I support the concerns expressed by Sustaining the Wild Coast in reference to the N2 Wild Coast Toll road EIA which are summarily expressed in the attached. Please note these as independent commentaries from … ( add your name/s / contact details) .

Note that this is a summary of some of the main points that SWC has raised in its N2 EIA commentary. If any of you would like to see the full EIA commentary please let me know. I will post it on the SWC website in a day or two.

If possible please send me a copy of your comments so we can get an idea of public response.

warm regards.
Val
swcoastval@gmail.com

click here to view the guidelines for N2 toll road comment.


Emphasis on sustainability in new approach to environmental reports

Herald – 12/04/2008
click here to view the article


De Pers – 19 December 2008

Click here to view the newspaper.