Herald online:Wild Coast doesn’t need toll road
Guy Rogers ENVIRONMENT & TOURISM EDITOR
RATHER than a profit- driven toll road mega- development, the Wild Coast needs its existing road system and local government capacity improved.
That‘so the view of Sustaining the Wild Coast (SWC), the public participation and conservation NGO spearheading opposition against the Wild Coast N2 toll road project, which has been proposed by the SA National Roads Agency Ltd (Sanral).
The controversial project is aimed at building a high- speed link between Durban and East London, with an 80km section between Port St Johns and Port Edward to be routed through a world-acclaimed botanical mecca.
The project was initially approved in 2004 by Environmental Affairs Minister Marthinus van Schalkwyk, but after considering appeals the minister judged that there were “inappropriate links” between environmental consultants Bohlweki and the consortium of construction companies who were bidding.
He did not quash the project completely, however, and a new EIA was launched in 2006.
It was finished in November last year and the public were given three months, much of it over the Christmas holidays, to comment.
These comments are now sitting with NMA, the public participation consultant, in Johannesburg.
The company could not be reached for comment this week, but correspondence from it reveals that “thousands” of comments have been received.
They are now being collated and will be passed on, with the EIA, to the department of environmental affairs and tourism.
SWC spokesman Val Payn said one of her group‘s concerns was that the issue of tolling had not been considered in the EIA.
This should have included how much the envisaged tariffs would be and how this would affect use of the road, the movement of local communities and the cost of goods, she said.
“It raises the question we have asked from the start, which is: ‘Who is this road for?‘
“The construction and tolling companies and the company that wants to mine the Xolobeni dunes are the only obvious beneficiaries at present.”
The fundamental flaw in the project was that it did not stem from a regional development plan which identified a need and then looked for the best way to meet that need, she said.
“The Wild Coast spatial development initiative published in the late 1990s refers to the need for improved road infrastructure, which no one disputes. But it also says the Pondoland centre of endemism (PCE) should not be damaged.
“Sanral‘s proposed route through the PCE is an unsolicited bid primarily motivated by profit.”
Payn said the context of a regional development plan was a prerequisite for any proper consideration of the project.
Such a plan would include the need to improve government capacity to cope with the increased management and planning pressures that the road would bring.
It was also necessary to explain how the multiplier effects of the road would be controlled and stimulated for maximum benefits, she said.
“Without it, the N2 is liable to result in increasing environmental pressures on sensitive environments, leading to increasing environmental degradation and a spiral of increasing poverty and inequality.
“What the Wild Coast needs is not a toll road, but improved local road infrastructure and much increased capacity-building at local government level.
“Lastly, we need an investment in the development of local human skills and local economies at grassroots level.”
Sanral spokesman Fanie van Aardt dismissed SWC‘s warning that the project would result in environmental degradation and worse poverty if it was not linked to a regional development plan as being “purely speculative”.
“The implementation of the N2 Wild Coast toll highway would indeed assist in the development of local road infrastructure during the construction period and into the operational period,” he said.
“For the Pondoland area, where poverty and unemployment affect countless people, it is the possible catalyst to the improvement of the community lifestyle.”
Van Aardt said tolling had not been considered in the EIA because this was “a separate process which will get under way once the EIA has been approved”.
He said he did not agree that this approach could result in a skewed presentation in the EIA of the costs and benefits of the project.
“The benefits on some parts of the road will be more than on others, but overall the benefits will outweigh the costs.”
The issue of increasing local government capacity and accountability “is beyond the scope of the EIA”, he said.
Environmental affairs and tourism deputy director-general Joanne Yawitch said the department did not comment on EIAs before they had been considered by the government, and a decision was issued.
Once this decision had been issued, there was an opportunity for appeals to be made and these were then considered by the minister, she noted.
Posted on February 10th, 2009 by Louis
Filed under: Articles, Current Issues, Newspaper and Media | No Comments »
