Shabangu to decide fate of Xolobeni in next 30 days

JOHANNESBURG (miningweekly.com) – Mineral Resources Minister Susan Shabangu would make a decision, within 30 days, on whether or not mining of heavy minerals, at the Xolobeni mine on the Wild Coast of South Africa, could proceed.

This followed the Amadiba Crisis Committee’s (ACC’s) appeal of the granting of the licence, which was awarded for a portion of the proposed project, by the then Minister of Minerals and Energy, Buyelwa Sonjica, in 2008.

The Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) said that it no longer intended to facilitate a second round of hearings on the matter, which it scheduled for this month.

The Minister would be advised to adjudicate upon the appeal, based on the available documentation, including the interim report made by the Holomisa task team.

This came after the legal representatives of the ACC objected to a second round of hearings and another report being drawn up on the issue, which it deemed unnecessary because a report had already been compiled.

The local community near Xolobeni, the mining company Transworld Energy and Minerals (TEM), and subsequently property developers in the area have sought a resolution on this issue since early 2009.

The major concern highlighted in the Holomisa report was that that TEM had applied for the right to mine a number of “blocks” of titanium-mineral bearing sands, however it was only granted the right to mine one of these, the largest, called the Kwanyana block.

It was questioned whether or not the project was still feasible since only one block could be mined, and this would likely mean that the associated processing facility (which would have created many of the jobs on the operation), would no longer be built in the area.
Thus, the report questioned why a mining right could be awarded for one block, when no feasibility study had been conducted to see if this was viable.

It was also understood that a letter, with a list of requirements, was sent to TEM in July 2008, by the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act regional manager, however it appeared that the right was granted in December 2008, without any, or all, of the issues raised in the letter having been attended to. This included a number of environmental impacts.

The Holomisa task team also noted that the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) was strongly opposed to mining in the area, and was “seriously concerned that the issues raised by the DEA were not addressed sufficiently or at all”.

by: Christy van der Merwe
source: http://www.miningweekly.com/


MINING & THE ENVIRONMENT DMR releases Xolobeni report, concerns highlighted

JOHANNESBURG (miningweekly.com) – The Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) has released the ‘Holomisa Report’, which advises Mineral Resources Minister Susan Shabangu on the Xolobeni mining right appeal.

The mining right was awarded to Transworld Energy and Minerals (TEM) in 2008, for the Kwanyana block of mineral sands on the Wild Coast.

Although dated March 2010, the report was only released on January 31. The DMR said that the delay in taking a decision on the report was owing to “administrative processes and pressures within the department”.

The report outlined a number of areas of concern and made a final recommendation that an interdepartmental committee, including the departments of Environmental Affairs, Water Affairs, Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, and Rural Development and Land Reform, should weigh up matters and direct the way forward.

The report was drawn up by a committee formed to investigate the issue, headed by Phatekile Holomisa, which reviewed documentation received from affected parties.

The DMR has indicated that further hearings into the matter would take place at the DMR’s Durban regional office from February 16 to February 18.

The major concern highlighted in the Holomisa report was that that TEM had applied for the right to mine a number of “blocks” of titanium-mineral bearing sands, however it was only granted the right to mine one of these, the largest, called the Kwanyana block.

It was questioned whether or not the project was still feasible since only one block could be mined, and this would likely mean that the associated processing facility (which would have created many of the jobs on the operation), would no longer be built in the area.

Thus the report questioned why a mining right could be awarded for one block, when no feasibility study had been conducted to see if this was viable.

It was also understood that a letter, with a list of requirements, was sent to TEM in July 2008, by the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act Regional Manager, however it appeared that the right was granted in December 2008, without any, or all, of the issues raised in the letter having been attended to. This included a number of environmental impacts.

The Holomisa task team also noted that the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) was strongly opposed to mining in the area, and was “seriously concerned that the issues raised by the DEA were not addressed sufficiently or at all”.

A comparative assessment of the identified land use alternatives, such as ecotourism in the area, should also have been included in the Record of Decision, but the Holomisa report said that no evidence of such evaluation was found.

The report also stated that while “TEM has submitted ‘prima facie’ proof of consultation as is required in regulation, the task team, is however, concerned that there is no conclusive evidence that the appropriate Traditional Authorities were the ones that were consulted”.

This lack of consultation was the grounds for the appeal of the mining licence, which was submitted by the Amadiba Crisis Committee in early 2009.

“The question is, on what basis was the mining right granted without an approved environmental impact assessment and an approved environmental management programme?” the Holomisa report asked.

By: Christy van der Merwe
11th February 2011


Wild Coast plans show preference for mining

Source iol.co.za

For some time, the state has withheld two pieces of information with significance for mining along the Wild Coast of the Eastern Cape. Under much pressure, the government has now released both.

Both documents are shocking, but taken together, they paint a cynical picture of a potentially concerted effort to engineer an economically viable dispensation for mining on the Wild Coast with scant regard for communities and environment.

The first document came in the form of the terms of reference issued by roads agency Sanral to an environmental consultancy for the proposed N2 toll highway, which hugs the coastal sites that prospective miners are eyeing. The terms of reference specifically instruct the consultant to provide “a strong motivation for excluding the R61 and current N2 as options”.

Imagine the outrage if the assessment for a fictional new highway between Durban and Johannesburg was not compared with the impact of upgrading the N3.

That we even have sight of these terms of reference is thanks to Cullinan & Associates, which applied under the Promotion of Access to Information Act. It acts for the Sigidi, Baleni and Mdatya communities, the Khimbili Property Association and residents in the amaDiba tribal authority.

The law firm first successfully opposed environmental authorisation for the proposed N2 highway in 2004, sending Sanral back to the drawing board.

Senior director Cormac Cullinan says: “It’s indisputable that if the new road doesn’t go ahead, it will have a major impact on the financial viability of mines… That’s a strong reason why they didn’t want to consider the existing route.”

The toll road appeal is now with the Department of Environmental Affairs. Cullinans alleges Sanral appears to have intended to mislead the minister because the agency initially denied its consultant had been specifically excluded from considering certain alternatives.

The second document to come to light is the nearly year-old report by Congress of Traditional Leaders of SA chief Patekile Holomisa, who led a task team assessing the award of a 2008 mining right to Transworld Energy and Mineral Resources to mine titanium on the Kwanyana block of Xolobeni on the Wild Coast.

The Department of Mineral Resources finally made Holomisa’s report public last week, and it is rather instructive. It points out that Transworld indicated a feasibility study would be carried out “as soon as the mining right is formally granted” – whereas the law requires proof that the mineral can be mined optimally. The report asks whether Transworld was allowed to dictate the processing of the application.

It also points out the mining right was granted without an environmental impact assessment, environmental management plan or further attention given to any of the department’s own stated requirements.

There was no study of the benefits of mining versus ecotourism and issues raised by the Department of Environmental Affairs were not addressed. The Department of Mineral Resources opted to reconvene the task team, which will hold hearings in Durban this month.

There is a third leg to the saga, a legal wrangle over the Commission for Traditional Leadership’s decision to dislodge amaPondo King Mpondombini Sigcau from the throne. Webber Wentzel says “a gross injustice to (our) clients appears to have been done, which cannot go unchallenged”.

Is it a coincidence that the deposed royals oppose both the Xolobeni mining and the N2 toll road?


BirdLife South Africa media release – mining and prospecting prohibition call by NGOs

Johannesburg, 1 February 2011: BirdLife South Africa supports the formal request by the Centre for Environmental Rights to the Minister of Mineral Resources for a prohibition on prospecting and mining in certain key areas of critical biodiversity and hydrological value and sensitivity. This is in accordance with Section 49 of the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act (Act 28 of 2002) (MPRDA), which gives the Minister the discretion to prohibit or restrict the granting of prospecting and mining rights in respect of identified land. This formal request is supported by a list of proposed key areas for prohibition of rights and suggested procedural restrictions aimed at improving the environmental impact assessment process applicable to these key areas.

“Mining and prospecting applications are becoming more widespread in South Africa, with many applications falling within key areas that provide very important ecosystem services, and in turn support very important economic and social activities such as agriculture and tourism”, says Carolyn Ah Shene-Verdoorn, Policy & Advocacy Manager at BirdLife South Africa. “The clash between environmental priorities and economic development has in most instances resulted in the environment being the loser and, while existing legislation is supposed to objectively regulate the processes, the implementation of this legislation at provincial levels is questionable. This is further exacerbated by high staff turnover within government departments, limited capacity and relatively poor communication between the relevant departments that are supposed to deliberate around these applications”.

Challenging the mining and prospecting rights issued for these sensitive areas is very costly for both the non-governmental organisations and the mining companies, and a list of clearly identified areas that prohibit prospecting and mining will go a long way in alleviating this situation. “As one of the coalition of eight non-government organizations, BirdLife South Africa has been involved in the development of this list of sensitive sites, which BirdLife South Africa feels will provide much more protection to South Africa’s Important Bird Areas by prohibiting or restricting commercial prospecting and mining at sites that are also very important for South Africa’s threatened and endemic birds”, says Daniel Marnewick, Important Bird Areas Programme Manager at BirdLife South Africa.

BirdLife South Africa recognises and applauds the steps taken by government to address the current imbalance between mining, environment and water prioritisation in South Africa, and sees this formal request to Minister Shabangu as forming part of the bigger process to address these important issues. Setting the stage for sustainable development within South Africa will ultimately benefit everyone, and will definitely promote South Africa as one of the better countries to invest in.


Legislation: Mining Minister urged to use green laws to save crisis areas

Legislation: Mining Minister urged to use green laws to save crisis areas

The controversy over a proposed mine at Xolobeni along the Wild Coast is just one example of where legislation can be used to protect biodiversity, an issue in the spotlight this week, as the Minerals Department comes under increasing pressure to protect endangered ecosystems, writes Legalbrief. The Centre for Environmental Rights has sent a formal proposal to Mineral Resources Minister Susan Shabangu, asking her to use legislation to restrict or ban mining, or even mining reconnaissance, in certain areas of ‘critical biodiversity’, reports Business Day. This came just before a Mining Indaba opened in Johannesburg yesterday. As Shabangu’s six-month moratorium on receiving new applications for prospecting rights comes to an end this month, the centre (representing 11 organisations) warned that in the past prospecting and mining rights in SA had been granted in some of these areas in spite of the existing statutory prohibition. A list of areas – including world heritage sites, national parks, marine protected areas, mountain catchment areas, sites recognised under the international Ramsar Convention on Wetlands and endangered and critically endangered ecosystems – was proposed. The report quotes Endangered Wildlife Trust CEO Yolan Friedmann as saying the request was ‘not something that has come on the back of nothing. Section 49 of the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act allows this. We are calling on her to enact (it).’ The proposal was also sent to Water and Environmental Affairs Minister Edna Molewa, SA Biodiversity Institute CEO Tanya Abrahamse and Chamber of Mines CEO Bheki Sibiya.
Full Business Day report
Act

Government says that full responsibility for managing the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process will still be transferred from the Minerals and Energy Department to the Environmental Affairs Department – but not soon. The Cape Argus notes that this was the word last week from Environmental and Water Affairs Deputy Minister Rejoice Mabudafhasi at a World Wetlands Day celebration at Verlorenvlei, on the West Coast near Elands Bay. There is concern in environmental circles at the slow progress in transferring full EIA responsibility to her department, which was supposed to have happened during a three-year process that started in April 2008. Some doubts have been expressed privately that, because of an apparent intergovernmental ‘turf war’ over effective political control of the crucial mining sector, the transfer might not happen at all.
Full Cape Argus report (subscription needed)

The Mineral Resources Department has proposed fresh hearings next month into the appeal by various Wild Coast communities and NGOs against the grant of a mining licence to extract minerals from the pristine dunes at Xolobeni. A Financial Mail report states that the project was first mooted by Australian junior miner Mineral Commodities nine years ago but is fiercely opposed by some communities and environmentalists. Community spokesperson John Clarke says holding another set of hearings is a waste of time as the consultation process has been shown to be flawed all the way through. The Xolobeni mineral sands project is an example of the conflict over sensitive environmental areas that August amendments to the National Environmental Management Act (Nema) seek to address. University of KwaZulu-Natal associate professor Ed Couzens said the mining industry once again was receiving preferential treatment as it was excluded from having to comply with the new regulations for the time being.
Full Financial Mail report
Nema

And, a report has raised serious concerns about the granting of a mining licence to Transworld Energy and Mineral Resources SA (TEM) in 2008 – to mine titanium in the Xolobeni area of the Eastern Cape – saying the licence was apparently granted in spite of several regulatory requirements not being fulfilled. Business Day notes that the preliminary report, by a task team appointed by former Mineral Resources Minister Buyelwa Sonjica, questions how the mining licence could have been granted before a feasibility study was conducted. The team’s preliminary report – only in the public domain this week – is signed March last year. Lawyers for the Legal Resources Centre said they received the report only on Monday last week.
Full Business Day report

On a positive note, the SA mining sector is looking increasingly well placed to deal with climate change. The global mining sector is largely adopting a ‘wait-and-see’ approach to climate change actions, with only a few companies implementing sustainability measures, while others cite the lack of a business case to introduce any response, a KPMG survey has found. However, according to a Mining Weekly report in SA, the situation was said to be quite different, as the local mining industry was viewed as more diverse and mature, with a growing awareness of the impacts of climate change in the local economy. ‘In SA, a large number of mining companies are responding to the challenge by adopting climate-friendly practices,’ said KPMG Head of Mining in Africa, Ian Kramer. ‘Some of the reluctance to move can be attributed to regulatory uncertainty. However the release of the SA Green Paper (on Climate Change) gives the sector an opportunity to make its voice heard and address some of the issues that the paper seems to neglect in terms of impact on mining,’ he is quoted as saying.
Full Mining Weekly report
Survey

SA Mineral Resources Minister Susan Shabangu said yesterday she hoped amended minerals and mining legislation would be passed by Parliament by the end of the year. These amendments are intended to address weaknesses in the current legislation. An Engineering News report notes that the Department of Mineral Resources had reviewed the current legislation and the proposed amendments would be presented to Cabinet and, once agreed by Cabinet, set before Parliament. The Minister also announced that a new Electronic Mineral Management System was being implemented to replace the National Mineral Promotion System (NMPS). The NMPS was discredited by scandal last year, says the report. The new approach was based on a Geographic Information System, which included data on, for example, environmentally sensitive areas, to prevent the granting of licences covering such regions.
Full Engineering News report

Analysis

Energy: Thorium is a workable alternative to uranium – expert
It is indisputable that SA faces enormous challenges relating to security of energy supply, Professor Eben Mulder, Director of the Post Graduate School of Nuclear Science and Engineering at North West University, writes in the Cape Times. There is a virtually unknown alternative to the standard uranium fuel cycle for nuclear power reactors, he notes, explaining that it offers a variety of significant strategic and economic advantages. This alternative is thorium (Th-232). Faced with taxation on carbon dioxide production and the mounting cost of carbon sequestration technologies, fossil fuels are becoming expensive, while uranium is in dangerously short supply. Thorium occurs naturally and like uranium, Th-232 can transmute into a nuclear fuel that then undergoes nuclear reactions, releasing enormous amounts of energy. Mulder lists some of thorium’s important natural properties: Firstly, at no point in the thorium cycle – from mining to waste – can fuel or waste products be used as bomb material. Secondly, thorium is incapable of melting. Thirdly, thorium is radiotoxic for tens of years, as opposed to the thousands of years for uranium radioactive waste. Mulder argues that SA has a world-leading capacity in high-temperature gas-cooled pebble bed reactor technology. These reactors require virtually no modifications and no regulatory paradigm changes in order to accommodate thorium fuel. He posits that South African private industry, with government support, should employ the skills and capacity to beneficiate thorium resources to provide cheap base-load electricity, eliminate energy constraints that inhibit the country’s economic growth, and provide cost-effective, environmentally friendly process heat and steam for the chemical industry.
Full Cape Times report (subscription needed)

Africa

Conservation: Zim ivory stockpiles grow
Zimbabwe’s ivory stockpile has rocketed to 42 000 kg, up from a previous record of 29 000, but the country cannot sell it due to a ban, state media reported last week. A report in The Times quotes Romana Nyahwa, acting director for Zimbabwe National Parks and Wildlife, as saying: ‘At the moment there is a nine-year moratorium on the international sale of ivory from Zimbabwe; it will end in 2016.’ The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) imposed the moratorium in an attempt to curb poaching. ‘But it is not definite that after 2016 we will be able to sell our ivory,’ added Nyahwa. She said the country would have to apply for a special permission from CITES to sell the tusks. It costs Zimbabwe $13m annually to secure the stockpile. Most of the tusks, valued at $10m, were collected from conservation areas and rural districts countrywide.
Full report in The Times

General: Namibia outlaws sand mining in Swakopmund
The Namibian Environment and Tourism Ministry says that the sand mining taking place in the Swakop River is in violation of the permit issued by the Agriculture, Water and Forestry Ministry, says The Namibian. It has stipulated that no sand mining should be allowed to continue without an Environmental Impact Assessment and an environmental management plan in place that detail requirements for the prevention of environmental damage. The Swakopmund municipality had been given the right to manage sand mining in the Swakop River, but it has been uncontrolled for the past two years. A ‘degree of grace’ may be given to sand miners to continue mining at current sites, but no leniency will be granted for new sites in terms of the Environmental Management Act.
Full report in The Namibian
Act

General: Study warns of investor land-grabs in Africa
African nations risk giving investors access to large areas of land in one-sided deals that fail to deliver real benefits, according to the first legal analysis of contracts published last week by the International Institute for Environment and Development (Iied). A report on the Iied site notes that the study analyses 12 recent contracts through which investors have leased large areas of land in east, west, central and southern Africa for various agricultural activities. It found many problems with the contracts but also some signs of positive deals. A number of the contracts reviewed appear to be heavily biased in favour of the investors, granting them long-term access to land at low cost while, in return, requiring little from investors in the form of benefits for local people and safeguards to protect the environment.
Full report on the Allafrica site
Report

World

General: Deep-sea mining companies face no-limits claims
Deep-sea mining companies will bear unlimited liability for any ecological damage they cause in international waters, a panel of 11 UN judges ruled last week in Hamburg. An Earthtimes report notes that they were issuing a long-awaited legal opinion on who pays for accidents when minerals are gathered from the seabed in international waters. Although no country has begun commercial mining, licences can be issued by the International Seabed Authority, which is part of the UN system and is based in Kingston, Jamaica. The authority had asked the judges in Hamburg for the ruling on the hypothetical issue. Ruediger Wolfrum, a German judge on the tribunal, said he hoped most nations now adopted those legal standards in their national law. Some 161 nations have signed the Law of the Sea Convention.
Full Earthtimes report
Convention

Legislation: EU states can ban GM crops for public order
EU governments could ban the cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops to maintain public order in the face of popular opposition to the technology, the bloc’s executive says in a draft document. A report on the PlanetArk site says that bans could also be justified on public morality grounds, such as religious or philosophical concerns over GM technology, according to a list drawn up by the European Commission as part of plans to let states decide whether to grow or ban GM crops. The list was drafted after EU countries asked the Commission to spell out the grounds on which they could justify proposed GM crop bans. While it is not yet final, it gives a clear indication of the Commission’s likely recommendations.
Full report on the PlanetArk site

Climate change: Organised crime possibly behind carbon market hacking
Organised crime may have stolen EU emission allowances last month, and national authorities are working with Europol to catch the thieves, a top EU climate official has said. Business Day notes that a series of computer-hacking attacks, which led the EU regulator on 19 January to suspend the registries in 30 countries that track carbon permits, show some member states and firms neglected security rules, Jos Delbeke, Director-general for Climate at the European Commission, said. ‘Investigations are being carried out by member states, and the Europol is involved,’ the report quotes Delbeke as saying. ‘Protracted closures’ may jeopardise liquidity in the six-year-old carbon programme, said the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA), at a time when global climate talks are stalled and industries in Japan and the US oppose the introduction of cap-and- trade plans.
Full Business Day report

Europe must bridge a €2.2trn ‘carbon capital chasm’ if it is to meet 2020 carbon emissions reduction targets, says a report in The Independent. It notes that the EU needs to invest €2.9trn in changes to its buildings, energy and transport infrastructure to reduce emissions. And given the state of public finances most of that will have to come from financial institutions, a study from Accenture and Barclays Capital said last week. The headline number is equivalent to about 2% of Europe’s GDP, while finance to the low-carbon sector has fallen by around three-quarters since before the global financial crisis. But with tweaks to government policy and new financial instruments such as ‘green bonds’, the 2020 target can still be met, Accenture’s managing director of sustainability, Peter Lacy said, according to the report.
Full report in The Independent
Study

The International Finance Corporation (IFC) last week launched a €150m fund to forward purchase certified emission reductions (CERs) or carbon credits that were expected to be produced between 2013 to 2020, from greenhouse-gas reducing projects, either directly financed by the IFC or by local banks financed by the IFC. An Engineering News report states that this was aimed at helping to reduce GHG emissions, extend carbon markets, and increase access to finance for projects that promote environmentally friendly economic growth.
Full Engineering News report

The deepest recession since the 1930s has failed to reverse rising global carbon emissions, as plummeting industrial output in the west was offset by the continuing rapid expansion of China and a handful of other emerging economies, new statistics for 2009 show. According to The Ecologist, while US emissions fell substantially in 2009 to levels not seen since 1995-96, China surged ahead with an increase of more than 13% on the previous year – the equivalent of adding the yearly emissions of Germany, Greece and Peru combined. However, green campaigners want to stop western companies using the focus on China and their own falling output as an excuse for backpedalling on climate change. They have urged governments in developed countries to strengthen their emissions targets to prevent businesses from taking what would amount to an ‘emissions holiday’.
Full report in The Ecologist
Statistics

The UK is likely to feel bigger costs from climate change than most other EU countries, a report concludes. A BBC News report states that rising sea levels are likely to impact the nation harder than most, negating economic benefits from increased tourism and possibly farm yields. The findings come from a study funded by the European Commission. It projects a net cost for most EU nations, but a net benefit for a few. The researchers took four different scenarios of warming into account, and saw the biggest impact on the British Isles at the high-temperature end – a rise of about 5°C from now.
Full BBC News report
Study

There’s bad news for US environmentalists – Senator John Barrasso, Republican of Wyoming, has introduced legislation to block the Environmental Protection Agency from taking any action to regulate greenhouse gases to address climate change, reports The New York Times. His broadly written Bill is one of several assaults on the EPA’s regulatory authority that will be coming from Republicans and coal-state Democrats in both houses of Congress in coming days, the report says. Joe Mendelson, global warming policy director for National Wildlife Federation, called the Barrasso Bill a ‘frontal assault’ on the nation’s basic environmental laws. ‘It would create a parade of polluter loopholes allowing for unlimited carbon pollution,’ Mendelson is quoted in the report as saying.
Full report in The New York Times

Experts hope that the arrival of giant Cyclone Yasi on the coast of Queensland, already hit by massive floods last month, will help bring more of a sense of urgency to the political debate over climate policy, says a report in Business Day. Australia has endured two of its deadliest summers on record, blamed in part on global warming, but record fires, floods and cyclones have not persuaded it to take strong action on climate change. ‘If you want a picture of what a hostile and costly environment looks like, we’ve had it in spades over the past couple of years,’ John Connor, CEO of the Climate Institute think tank, is quoted as saying.
Full Business Day report

Fertilising the oceans to boost the growth of tiny plants that soak up greenhouse gases is unlikely to work as a way to slow climate change, a UN-backed study shows. A report in The Times notes that such ‘geo-engineering’ schemes would be hard to monitor and were likely to store away only small amounts of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, according to a report by the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. The review, by scientists in seven countries, said 13 experiments in recent years showed faded optimism that iron dust or other nutrients could spur growth of microscopic marine plants and permanently suck carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Firms including Climos, Atmocean Inc and the Ocean Nourishment Corp have been looking into ocean fertilisation technology as a way of offsetting emissions of greenhouse gases from factories, power plants and cars.
Full report in The Times
Summary document

Energy: US companies probed for alleged illegal ‘fracking’
Several US energy companies may have violated environmental rules by injecting diesel into the ground without permits as part of a controversial natural gas drilling technique, according to findings from Congressional probe released last week. According to a report on the PlanetArk site, the probe of diesel use in hydraulic fracturing, a practice that has allowed drillers to tap abundant shale gas, found that oil services firms such as Halliburton and BJ Services, which was bought by Baker Hughes Inc, injected millions of litres of fluids containing the fuel into wells between 2005 and 2009. A total of 12 companies were cited in the probe for using diesel without proper permits. Democrats who sponsored the probe in the House of Representatives urged the Environmental Protection Agency to look into this matter.
Full report on the PlanetArk site

Greenpeace has released a new study projecting solar investments to double by 2015 as costs are expected to drop by a further 40%. A report in The Times notes that the report shows how global investments in solar photovoltaic (PV) technology could double from €35-40bn today to more than €70bn in 2015. The report foresees that PV alone could account for 12% of European power demand by 2020, and up to 9% of the global power demand by 2030. The report quotes European PhotoVoltaic Industry Association president Ingmar Wilhelm as saying: ‘Solar photovoltaic technology has, for many years now, shown increased power efficiencies and cost reductions.’ In addition to its environmental benefits, the report shows solar energy to be a sustainable way to address concerns about energy security and volatile fossil fuel prices, as well as a substantial factor in economic development.
Full report in The Times
Report

Conservation: Malaysian peat swamps obliterated for palm oil – study
Peat swamp forests, home to such species as the Borneo pygmy elephant, are being obliterated in Malaysian Borneo to make way for palm oil plantations, according to a study. A report in The Independent quotes the Netherlands-based Wetlands International who said that the ecologically important forests could disappear from Sarawak state by the end of the decade if the destruction did not stop. The study said that Malaysian Government figures seriously underestimated the extent of the problem, and that studies it conducted using satellite images and field surveys gave a very worrying picture.
Full report in The Independent
Study

A 10-year project, ‘Assessing the Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems’ (Safe) will assess impact of the rapid spread of palm oil plantations. It will determine whether setting-aside natural forests within plantations can save threatened species such as the orang-utan, pygmy elephant and clouded leopard. A report in The Ecologist notes that researchers from Imperial College London and The Royal Society are beginning to analyse the impact of palm oil plantations on biodiversity across an estimated 20 000 ha site in Borneo – the largest project of its kind in the world. The project will look at whether these isolated patches of forest are able to support and sustain high levels of biodiversity. The palm oil industry has already shown a willingness to accept the findings. One of the world’s largest producers, Sime Darby, is funding the study and the research team said it is in discussions about involving other companies, including Singapore-based Wilmer.
Full report in The Ecologist
SAFE

Water: Catastrophic drought in the Amazon
A widespread drought in the Amazon rainforest last year caused the ‘lungs of the world’ to produce more carbon dioxide than they absorbed, potentially leading to a dangerous acceleration of global warming, says a report in The Independent. Scientists have calculated that the 2010 drought was more intense than the ‘one-in-100-year’ drought of 2005. They are predicting it will result in some 8bn tons of carbon dioxide being expelled from the Amazon rainforest, which is more than the total annual carbon emissions of the US. Scientists believe that the highly unusual nature of the two droughts, which occurred in the space of just five years, may be the result of higher sea-surface temperatures in the tropical Atlantic, which could also be influenced by global warming.
Full report in The Independent
Study

Water: EPA to regulate perchlorate
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reversed Bush administration drinking water policies, announcing that it will regulate perchlorate, a component of rocket fuel, and 16 other chemicals – called volatile organic compounds – that can cause cancer at high enough doses. A report in The Washington Post quotes EPA administrator Lisa P Jackson who said the perchlorate decision ‘is about protecting the health of between 5 (million) and 17 million Americans that are exposed to perchlorate in the water they drink’. The EPA said it would take another two years to propose a perchlorate regulation, a pace that angered some environmental groups. The EPA has collected 39 000 public comments regarding perchlorate regulations.
Full report in The Washington Post

General: Lipton Tea testing on animals comes to a halt
Animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has succeeded in stopping the owner of Lipton and PG Tips teas, the giant Unilever group, from using animals to show the curative properties of its teas, states a report in The Times. PETA said London-based Unilever had bowed to 40 000 emails and meetings between the group and company officials, and halted the testing. The report quotes PETA as saying: ‘No more piglets will be infected with E. coli toxin and have their intestines cut apart while they are still alive… rabbits’ heads won’t be cut off, and other cruel tests that involved tormenting and killing animals simply to study the health effects of tea products and ingredients will no longer take place.’
Full report in The Times

Enviro Briefs

* Two men were arrested last week when they were caught with R10 000 worth of abalone in Port Elizabeth. Both men appeared in court on charges of illegal possession of abalone.
− The Herald (subscription needed)

* Water and Environmental Affairs Minister Edna Molewa has published the National Domestic Waste Collection Standards. Non-recyclable material such as perishable food waste must be collected at least once a week and recyclable materials must be collected once every two weeks.
− BuaNews

* Tall buildings that obstruct views of Table Mountain and the sea will be monitored and restricted once the City of Cape Town’s tall building policy goes ahead. In the draft tall building bylaw, developers and architects will have to follow certain guidelines in terms of height, before any plans are approved, city architect Liezl Kruger said.
− Cape Times (subscription needed)

* A farmer outside Ga-Rankuwa, north of Pretoria, will be charged with defeating the ends of justice after he allegedly removed crocodiles from his farm, the Hawks said yesterday. Spokesperson McIntosh Polela said 200 live crocodiles were found at the farm on Friday and the farmer was ordered not to remove them, but only 20 were there yesterday.
− The Citizen

* The City of Cape Town has released a list of nature reserves to be proclaimed in terms of national legislation. This month sees a public participation process about this initiative, with people being invited to comment on the proclamation of each reserve and on its integrated management plan.
− Cape Argus (subscription needed)

* The Ugandan National Environment Authority (Nema) is set to study the quality of air in Kampala to help formulate new air quality standards. Nema environment audit and monitoring officer Dick Lufafa said a consultancy is being procured to study the air quality and modify the current draft air quality standards.
− The Monitor

* An agreement on the equitable sharing of genetic resources on the world’s biodiversity has been opened for signatures by governments. The Nagoya Protocol, signed by 193 governments, seeks to regulate access to the world’s plants, animal and micro-organisms, which are useful to life on Earth.
− Earthtimes

* India’s Environment Ministry has approved plans by South Korea’s Posco to build a $12bn steel mill. The Environment Ministry attached a series of additional conditions for Posco, including protecting the fragile coastline and its wildlife, but analysts said they were not major obstacles.
− Business Day

* The UN has launched a campaign to raise awareness of the vital role trees and wood products play in sustaining the livelihoods of millions of people around the world. The launch of the International Year of Forests at a ceremony in New York was accompanied by the release of a report calling for the need to change the ‘generally poor perception’ of wood products.
− Earthtimes
Report

* Carbon registries in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Slovakia and Britain resumed normal operations on Friday, the EU executive said. However, most carbon exchanges are still reviewing security issues. The European Commission halted spot trade on 19 January after 3.1m permits, called EU Allowances, vanished from national electronic carbon registries in Greece, Austria and the Czech Republic after attacks by cyber criminals.
− PlanetArk


More hearings on Xolobeni mine scheduled for Feb

By: Christy van der Merwe

26th January 2011

JOHANNESBURG (miningweekly.com) – A second task team would be established to hear oral presentations by parties affected by the proposed heavy minerals mine in Xolobeni, which is located on the South African Wild Coast.

The hearings would be held at the Department of Mineral Resources’ (DMR’s) Durban regional office from February 16 to February 18.

The task team would then make recommendations to Mineral Resources Minister Susan Shabangu, on whether or not to uphold the granting of the licence to mine the Kwanyana block of mineral-rich sands near Xolobeni, or to rescind the licence – as per the appeal from certain community members.

Australia-based Mineral Resource Commodities, through its South African subsidiary Transworld Energy & Minerals, was granted a licence to mine for titanium-bearing minerals on a portion of the dunes, in December 2008.

The Kwanyana block contains some 139-million tons of heavy titanium-producing minerals, including ilmenite, zircon, leucoxene, and rutile. Of the four blocks making up the Xolobeni project area, the Kwanyana block had the largest measured resource.

The Amadiba Crisis Committee (ACC) then appealed the awarding of the licence in early 2009, stating that the community was not properly consulted.

In February 2010, the Minerals and Mining Development board, which advises the Minister of Mineral Resources, appointed a committee headed by Phatekile Holomisa, which received documentation from affected parties, and compiled a report, which it submitted to the Minister.

No further information was given about the report, affected parties requested sight of it but have never seen it.

The DMR, in January, stated that the Holomisa report was merely an interim report, which did not contain any firm recommendations on the merit or demerit of the appeals.

It was described as an “interim measure that addressed procedure rather than substance”, and recommended that other stakeholders be afforded the opportunity to provide input to a panel to finalise the appeal.

“Our clients are extremely concerned that it has taken almost a year from the time the Holomisa task team made its recommendations to the Minister for her to come to a decision, and then only to decide to hold further hearings. The panel that is to hear the matter has still not been constituted and the Minister appears not to have applied her mind to the appeal at all,” said Legal Resources Centre (LRC) representative Sarah Sephton.

The Grahamstown-based LRC is representing the ACC.

The DMR was currently in the process of inviting nominations for new panel members, and the panel would be headed by the DMR legal services director, as the chairperson.

The panel would consist of: an environmental expert nominated by the DMR, a nominated official from the DMR Mineral Regulation branch, an environmental expert nominated by the Department of Environmental Affairs, a representative nominated by the Department of Land Affairs, a representative nominated by the Provincial Department of Economic Affairs, Eastern Cape, a representative nominated by the OR Tambo district municipality, and a representative nominated by the Bizana municipality.

MRC South Africa GM John Barnes confirmed that the company had been informed of the new hearings through a letter from the DMR, and also that the company had not been informed of any recommendations put forward in the first report.

Barnes added that while the company awaited the DMR decision on the granting of the Xolobeni licence, it was moving ahead with its Tormin mineral sands project on the west coast of South Africa.

Sephton stated that the delays were prejudicial to the LRC’s clients.

“In the meantime, our clients are still unable to make any use of the land in question. Prior to the grant of the prospecting licence, an important eco-tourism project was under way in the Xolobeni area. Since then, however, all efforts to further this project have been unsuccessful and our clients have suffered important financial losses as a result,” she explained.

She added that the harmony within the community has also suffered as conflicts have emerged between the proponents of the mining initiative and those who favour the eco-tourism plan as a means to develop the region.

“There can be no healing until a final decision is made. These lengthy and unexplained delays have marked this entire process and are quite frankly ludicrous,” Sephton exclaimed.


 Toll fees may be scrapped

TRANSPORT Minister S’bu Ndebele has declined to confirm or deny media reports that the government will scrap toll fees for the controversial N2 Wild Coast highway plan.
This follows a recent report by Fin24 which suggests construction of a new highway would go ahead on the scenic Wild Coast – but no longer as a toll road.Fin24 said construction could begin later this year and Ndebele had indicated that funds could come from the National Treasury.But the office of Ndebele’s spokesman, Logan Maistry, has declined to comment on the report, noting the minister’s official position had been spelled out in an article in The Mercury last month.

In that article, Ndebele confirmed that there had been “continuous engagement” between his ministry, the government road agency Sanral, the KZN provincial government and other stakeholders.
The latest news report follows a statement last month in which the KZN government threatened to go to court to oppose any move to erect toll booths south of Durban to help finance the construction of a new greenfields route along the Wild Coast.
Nevertheless, there have been several other indications that Sanral and other parties have been working behind the scenes to clear the pathway for a new route on the Wild Coast.

Objections
Although the national Department of Environmental Affairs gave the green light last year, several groups have lodged legal objections with the current environment minister, Edna Molewa.

Sanral chief Nazir Alli said he had no reason to doubt the Fin24 report, but he was not aware that any final decision had been reached on the tolls. “It is true that there have been discussions and we will continue to look at various funding models. Funding is always the big issue, but if the National Treasury tells us to build the road, we will build it.”
However, Cape Town attorney Cormac Cullinan said that even if toll fees were dropped, Sanral still faced significant legal and procedural hurdles.

Cullinan, who has lodged an objection on behalf of local communities in the Pondoland region of the Wild Coast, says documents obtained during a recent Promotion of Access to Information Act application suggested that the independence of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) had been significantly compromised.
Nevertheless, the Democratic Alliance has welcomed the reported decision by Ndebele to block plans to levy further tolls.
The party’s KZN transport spokesman, Radley Keys, said he had introduced a motion in the provincial parliament eight years ago against further toll booths in KZN.
“The outcome, of what has been a protracted debate at both provincial and national level, shows that our steadfast commitment to this cause? produces results. We now welcome the united voice against tolling that has been adopted by all parties in the province.”

source: Group writers SA
Author: Tony Carnie
Date: 25 January 2011