Wild Coast Toll Road Extention

December 15 2008

The cut-off date for public comment on the controversial Wild Coast Toll Road EIR has been extended to 22 January, 2009.

This follows concern expressed by numerous Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs) that the cut off date of 9th January was cutting into the holiday season. The same had been the case with the Record of Decision authorizing the N2 toll road over the summer holiday season of 2003/2004. Many organizations felt this was a ploy to cut out comment as most of South Africa is on holiday over the festive season.

“We are most grateful to the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT) who had responded that the comment period must be extended until January 22″, said Bishop Geoff Davies, Chairman of Sustaining the Wild Coast (SWC). “SWC was among many who objected to the short comment period. We are told that all I&APs should now receive notification of the extension by post.

“However, we are surprised that our other concerns have not been addressed, as we cannot comment meaningfully until they have. These are that the public open days were held in KZN and Eastern Cape only, while there are many interested and affected parties who live in Gauteng or the Free State or Western Cape, and that the EIR presentations that were held were inaccessible to the local communities of Pondoland and the Eastern Cape. These are the
people who will be the most directly affected.

SWC wrote to NMA, who is responsible for the public participation process, that the format of the information displays and presentations at the public open days was neither culturally nor educationally suitable as a means of conveying adequate and understandable information to rural communities residing in Eastern Cape. “SWC considers the format used did not enable disempowered, often illiterate, orally based communities to gain an adequate understanding
of the full implications of the road.

“Since the last scheduled public open day was 11 December, we are dismayed that there has been no response to this point. The National Environment Management Act (NEMA) Section 4(2)(f) requires the state to ensure participation by vulnerable and disadvantaged persons in environmental governance. Section 2(4)(h) of NEMA prescribes the following additional measures to ensure the protection of the environment : `community well-being and empowerment must be promoted through environmental education, the raising of
environmental awareness, the sharing of knowledge and experience and other appropriate means´.

Consequently, SWC called for an extension of the Public Comment Period , an extension of workshops and public comment days to other Provinces, and a relook at the presentation format in rural communal areas which would allow for a `community education´ process that
would empower rural communities with the means to become informed decision makers with regard to the proposal.

“There is a great deal of public concern regarding the future well-being of the Wild Coast” commented Bishop Davies who is also director of the Southern African Faith Communities Environment Institute (SAFCEI), “so we look forward to hearing from NMA that they will pay heed to our call which, after all, simply follows the requirements of our National Environment act.”


Reminder to all Anti Toll Motorists & Residents

Amanzimtoti show your displeasure to the Consultants and SANRAL.

Reminder to all Anti Toll Motorists & Residents

Draft EIA Open House at the Toti Civic Centre 18th Nov2008 @ 16h30.

Do not waste your valuable time paging through a set of documents presented by the Independent Consultants who get their instructions and payment from SANRAL.
If you have the time the Executive Summary is enough to make you realize that there are many significant facts that affect us here on the Upper South Coast that wont be found in the 1000 pages of considerably biased justification you are expected to swallow, then allow SANRAL to go ahead with making us on the Upper South Coast pay for the 90 km of new road on the Wild Coast.

We will ask the Consultants to try to answer and dispute the following and a whole lot more.

Why no mention:
– Of the fact that a railway link will be the appropriate answer to all the needs of all people rich & poor, particularly in terms of affordable, safe, environmentally friendly transport, reducing heavy traffic on already overloaded roads and move agricultural and other goods and people for the sustainable future without fossil fuels been burnt and polluting our area.
- Of an alternate road around the outskirts towards the west of eThekwini.
- Of the fact that the Toll Gate at Isipingo will collect 86% of the cost of the 90 km strip of road on the Wild Coast at todays prices over 30 years, never mind the escalation in traffic and inflation.
- Of the fact that we are expected to pay 86 % of the cost for a road off which we will at most only use 15 km or only 2.68 %
- Of how the E Tag system is going to know that you came through the Main Toll Gate at Isipingo and left at the Joyner Ramp a distance of less than 1.5 km which will cost you R8 minimum.
- Of the fact that this new road is going to attract a considerable amount of traffic from west of eThekwini and put considerable strain on an already overloaded N3 and the poor unsuspecting motorist who have to access the N2 coming down the N3 and vice versa during peak times already a nightmare how will this be solved..
- Of how widening the N2 between Adams Road and Isipingo is going to be done.
- Of how the additional flow of traffic from the west is going to negate the widening of the road and loose any benefit of cutting down traveling time and justifying the toll payment.
- Of how we as motorists have no other alternative of traveling to and from our work place or schooling because of total lack of reliable safe and affordable public transport have now to bear the additional cost of being taxed to use an existing 60 year old road.
- Of why because our government has failed to provide enough funds to ensure that enough moneys is allocated to the provision and upkeep of our road net work, that SANRAL now feel they have the right to unfairly tax us on the Upper South Coast to pay for a road in another province.
- That if eThekwini had the full say over all the roads in the Metropolitan area as they should have, they would have insisted that the Developers of Arbour Town would have to pay the cost of widening the road from Winklespruit to Moss Kolnik because the shopping centre would be the main beneficiaries and also the cause of increased traffic on the road.

One is faced with an obvious question and that is seeing that there is a Government legislation that requires all these facts to be considered why this has not been done

I.e. National Environmental Management Act (NEMA)
Chapter 1 – Principles – sub section 2
Chapter (4) (i) The social, economic and environmental impacts of activities, including disadvantages and benefits must be considered, assessed and evaluated, and decisions must be appropriate in the lights of such consideration and assessment.

USCATA Nov 2008


WILD COAST TOLL ROAD EIA PUBLIC PARTICIPATION FLAWED

Sustaining the Wild Coast (SWC) calls upon the government of South Africa to reject out of hand the latest attempt to gain support for the ill-conceived Wild Coast Toll Road. [Read more...]


The AmaDiba Community Appeals Against the Award of a Mining Right to Transworld Energy and Mineral Resources

On behalf of the AmaDiba Crisis Committee (the ACC) and its members, the Grahamstown office of the Legal Resources Centre filed a Notice of Appeal with the Minister of Minerals and Energy (the Minister) on 2 September 2008. The ACC requested the Minister to suspend and then appeal the decision, signed by the Regional Manager of the Eastern Cape (the Regional Manager), to award a mining right to Transworld Energy and Mineral Resources (SA) (Pty) Ltd. (TEM) (pending the determination of its appeal and ultimately requesting the Minister to set aside the Director General’s decision to grant a mining right.). [Read more...]


MEDIA STATEMENT FROM AMADIBA COASTAL RESIDENTS AFFECTED BY XOLOBENI DUNE MINING PLANS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

26 August 2008.

DME officials visited the Umgungundlovu Great Place on the Pondoland Wild Coast took place on Wednesday 20 August 2008, as a follow up to the visit to the Xolobeni area by Minister Buyelwa Sonjica on Friday 15 August 2008. [Read more...]


Wild Coast Dune Mining Controversy: Wild Coast Dune Mining. Civil Society Response to HRC Subpoena Hearing held on Tuesday 22nd April 2008

On behalf of the Amadiba Crisis Committee and Sustaining the Wild Coast Association, we have the following statement in response to on the HRC Subpoena Hearing held today at the HRC Offices in Johannesburg, attended by representatives from the Departments of Minerals and Energy, Environmental Affairs and Tourism and Land Affairs. [Read more...]


Wild Coast Dune Mining Controversy: Amadiba Crisis Committee meeting with MRC representative Patrick Caruso.

Monday, 21 April 2008

Following ongoing conflict in the Xolobeni community with regard to the Mining Licence Application of MRC Ltd, Mr Patrick Caruso, brother of MRC CEO Mr Mark Caruso requested an urgent meeting with the Amadiba Crisis Committee, which took place on Sunday afternoon 20 April 2008 at the Mdatya SS School in the Amadiba Tribal Administrative Area in the Eastern Cape. [Read more...]