SustainiWild Coast Enviro-Focus 2020
ZWF INFO FYI – SWC ~ Sustaining the Wild Coast ~ Xolobeni Mining Updates
Minister delays mine appeal decision
MINERAL Resources’ Minister Susan Shabangu has told Pondoland opponents of a titanium dune mining project that she needs another month to consider their appeal against the Xolobeni coastal dune mining project. Shabangu had been scheduled to announce this week her decision on the appeal by the Amadiba Crisis Committee, which is based on the alleged failure of the applicant mining company to properly consult on the project with either residents of the area or the king and queen of Pondoland.
ZWF COMMENT :: Mining Consultants & Environmentalists alike have expressed grave reservations that this finance stricken Australian mining company (see story below) would be able to meet any of its rehabilitation obligations of the mining strip of prime coastal habitat (see map above) – It is imperative that Minister Shabangu is made aware of this critical situation – please contact your MP to hammer home this message.
This is yet another worrying saga in the growing onslaught by surface strip mining which threatens numerous regions of Zululand (current & future) & South Africa, as well as regions to the North – The Aussie/Chinese threat is ever daunting !!
ASX:MRC Financial Status
Posted: 14 Apr 2011 12:31 AM PDT
THE Australian company given rights to strip-mine along the Wild Coast has reported heavy financial losses, and is facing legal battles that may cost it even more. Mineral Commodities, whose chairman is Joseph Caruso, 61, and managing director Mark Caruso, 45, posted a R48million loss last year. The Perth-based miner’s future hinges on two South African projects: the controversial Xolobeni on the Wild Coast and Tormin on the West Coast. These it hopes to finance from its 5.7 percent stake in London AIM- listed Allied Gold, which operates mines in Papua New Guinea.
The latest facts emerging about the company have increased criticism that the Department of Minerals and Energy did not check the company’s financial standing thoroughly enough when it awarded the licence to mine in an environmental hot-spot .
Apart from the financial check, the Department of Environment and Tourism (Deat) concluded its report on the environmental impact assessment (EIA) with: “The department has grave concerns with regard to the proposed mining developments in the area and objects to it.
“Several crucial aspects and specialist studies are lacking. From the documentation submitted, it is clear that the accepted and adopted planning and policy guidelines for the area have not been taken into consideration and several of the legislative requirements have not been met.
“No time frames or schedules are included to indicate whether they will be adhered to.
“Deat has not received the application for the listed activities in terms of the EIA regulations under the National Environmental Management Act.
“This alone is an almost fatal flaw in the public process to be followed.”
In addition to the Deat’s rejection of the EIA , the SA Human Rights Commission alleged that the required community support for the controversial project had been obtained “Mafia-style”.
source : www.wccoa.co.za
Media Release Issued by Kibao Communications On behalf of Amadiba Crisis Committee
Posted: 29 Mar 2011 11:42 PM PDT
Issued by Kibao Communications
On behalf of Amadiba Crisis Committee
Further info:
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Mineral Resources Minister Susan Shabangu has failed to make a decision on the appeal against the mining right granted to Australian junior mining company Mineral Resources Commodities into mine the dunes at Xolobeni on the Wild Coast. She was due to speak on the controversial project on March 25, over two and a half years after the Amadiba Community threatened to take the Minister to Court to stop the mining project that has since 2003 become an ever more menacing threat to the unique biodiversity of the Wild Coast and traditional way of life of the amaMpondo.
Speaking on behalf of the Amadiba Crisis Committee which appealed the decision to allow mining, Sinegugu Zakhulu said “We cannot imagine what is causing her indecision on the matter. The Human Rights Commission as far back in 2007 was critical of the mining proposal, and even a special task team of the Mineral Resources Board, which was chaired by Patakile Holomisa, found glaring shortcomings in the mining rights application, including evidence that the traditional leadership, which includes the Chief and the King of amaMpondo were never consulted. This is apart from all the problems the task team found, with the water permits that had not been applied for, and the overwhelmingly negative long term environmental and economic impacts.
This is totally unacceptable because it is not only the mining which is ‘on hold’ but the revival of eco-tourism that is on hold, with all its job
creation potential”.
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WRITTEN REPLY TO QUESTION NO 3557
Posted: 28 Feb 2011 01:30 AM PST
Mr S B Farrow (DA) to ask the Minister of Transport:
(1) Whether the consultants who conducted the environmental impact assessment for the proposed N2 toll road through the Wild Coast considered the viability of upgrading the R61 as an alternative; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;
(2) whether an official in his department instructed them that a case should be made for why the R61 should not be upgraded as an alternative to the proposed N2 toll road; if not, how was this conclusion reached; if so, (a) to what degree was the independence of the EIA process compromised and (b) what are the further relevant details;
(3) whether the official who gave this instruction will be disciplined; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW4397E
For further information contact Val Payne (SWC) at webmaster@swc.org.za
Posted on April 18th, 2011 by Louis
Filed under: Current Issues, Related Info | No Comments »



























