communities have questions about mining proposal
Big money at stake in dunes
Sunday Tribune report – 9 Sept 2007

Photo: INLSA
September 09, 2007 Edition 3
Fred Kockott and Smilo Gobingca
DIRECTORS of Transkei’s controversial black economic empowerment company, Xolco, believe they could rake in huge sums of money – possibly up to R145.6 million a year – from planned heavy minerals mining on the Transkei’s Wild Coast.
But they have yet to decide what profits will flow back to people who have traditional land rights over proposed mining areas.
People who are directly affected by the mining proposals have no legal share in the planned mining operation extending along a 22km stretch of coastline below Port Edward – a prime eco-tourism route and potential food basket for the Eastern Cape and southern KwaZulu-Natal.
Mining representatives say this heavy minerals deposit, Xolobeni Mineral Sands, is the 10th largest in the world – a global resource worth $200 million (R1.4 billion).
Application
A mining rights application has already been lodged with the Department of Minerals and Energy by the Australian junior mining company, Mineral Commodities, and its wholly owned South Africa subsidiary, Transworld Energy Minerals (TEM).
As the BEE partner, Xolco has a 26% stake in the planned operations.
While the government is considering granting a licence, people have begun asking who will have the final say as to whether mining does go ahead, if traditional leaders under whose jurisdiction the land falls do not approve.
Also at issue, is how Xolco was formed, who appointed its directors, and what rights a private entity like Xolco has to represent the tribal authority and people living in and around the coastal dunes containing the valuable titanium producing minerals – rutile, zircon and ilmenite.
“How can a structure like Xolco that has been formed outside the tribal authority represent our community?” asked local shopkeeper Scorpion Dimane. “You can’t just form a private company to benefit from taking things from land that doesn’t even belong to you.
“People behind this are hiding some information because they want to feed themselves big money. That’s what started this whole problem.”
Dimane recently joined the Amadiba Crisis Committee – a coalition of people opposed to the mining plans. His nephew, 31-year-old Zeka Mnyamana, is Xolco’s secretary, and also serves as the group’s spokesman at public meetings.
Mnyamana said he and four other directors, including chairman Nomangezi Malunga and deputy chairman Christopher Ngcwele, were selected to represent the community at a meeting arranged by the original founder of Xolco, Madiba Qunya, in December last year.
He said that a network of trusts representing women, youth, the tribal authority, businessmen, the elderly and disabled was also being established to “plough mining profits back into the community”.
top.DisplayAds(‘SquareL’, 13, 3009);
“The mining will generate R560 million a year. Xolco’s share will be 26% of that amount (R145.6 million a year). It will go to the directors’ account, then from there to the trust accounts,” Mnyamana said.
Mnyamana is not sure who will exercise control over these funds, appoint trustees, and oversee financial management. “We need an expert – an accountant – to see how we run this business and how money is shared. The community can decide these things, how much we as directors get and how much goes to the community trusts,” said Mnyamana.
But there is little consensus on the proposed mining. On Wednesday, about 2 000 people met at the remote Umgungundlovu tribal authority to discuss concerns, and hear from those in favour of mining, and those opposed to it.
The meeting, said tribal elders, was the largest known gathering to have taken place in the area.
The meeting was sponsored by the O R Tambo District Municipality and proceedings presided over by Pondo king and queen, Mpondombini and MaSobhuza Sigcau.
Also attending as observers were the principal planner of the Eastern Cape’s Department of Land Affairs, Bennie Ntubane, deputy chairman of the South African Human Rights Commission, Zonke Majodina, commissioner Tom Manthata, head of the commission’s legal team, Khaya Zweni, and legal officer Gunikhaya Dudeni.
Apart from TEM’s community liaison officer, Bashin Qunya (the younger brother of Xolco’s founder, Madiba), mining representatives did not attend, nor did any officials from the Department of Minerals and Energy.
Urging people to work together, O R Tambo District Mayor Zoleka Capa said existing tensions would have been avoided had people been properly consulted and educated about the mining proposals. “What is this animosity among people who are married to each other, relatives who drink together, dance together, who actually shop from the same stores, people who drink from the same water . . . what has possibly come between them, what does it mean to me as their shepherd?” asked Capa.
The meeting ended with a forum being established to plan a follow up meeting. The forum comprises traditional leaders and representatives of local government, Xolco and the Amadiba Crisis Committee.
Forum
Traditional council leader, Nkosi G M Cinani said this forum would also engage the assistance of the Human Rights Commission and government departments, including and affairs and minerals and energy, in assessing the mining proposals and possible impacts on the community.
Welcoming this decision, Dimane said, “We are now talking to Xolco people. There is no fighting. Christopher Ngcwele (Xolco deputy chairman) is my friend. Zeka is my nephew. They now understand our concerns. Even they don’t know anything about mining, hardly anything at all.”
“What we need is the truth,” agreed Mnyamana. “We welcome what the Amadiba Crisis Committee is saying. They are asking questions about the mining, which we can’t answer. We need to have those answers before people can decide whether the mining should go ahead or not,” said Mnyamana.
Amadiba’s co-ordinator, Mzamo Dlamini, said the forum also planned to engage a lawyer to advise them on the community’s rights.
Posted on September 10th, 2007
Filed under: Newspaper and Media



















Development is the most important thint especialy in rural areas.I strongly believe that this mining is going to change our lives positively as a community becouse it is the best thing for people to get good jobs in their home land than to travel all the way to Johannesburg or Durban jost for R500 paying jobs (1st couse of poverty and surffering to his or her famil
becouse this person can only come back home once a year. my point of view isthat mining must go on those against it they are the enermies of progress
Dear Abongile,
Thanks for sending through a comment on our website. I would challenge you to give a much broader view point. I would be happy as well to support mining as a development, if that is what people of Xolobeni want. Here we are faced with the situation where the people of Xolobeni do not see mining as a solution to their development needs. Let us now analyze this mining and see if it will really bring the development you are talking about.
How many jobs are talking about here? The problem is that they are talking of 300 jobs of which only about 100 will be suitable for illiterate people of our village. The problem is that sand mining is highly mechanized (uses machines). We know the levels of literacy in our community. The mining operation is to be owned by an Australian company which has paid only a R1000 to obtain a mining license. The BEE company, XOLCO is expected to pay about R118 million to pay for its own shares. They do not have this money, but will be loaned by the Australian company (MRC/TEM). The mining lifespan is 22 years. XOLCO is therefore expected to pay back the loan during the first 10 years. They will only see benefits from their shareholding on the 11th year. This means XOLCO will owe the Australians for that period. Imagine if something goes wrong in this 10 years and business closes down. Now tell me is this development in your term??
XOLCO is said to represent the people of XOLOBENI, why then do they have to buy or pay for the shares in a business which is going to take land from them? Are they paying Australians to make money off their own land??? How would you feel if somebody wants to use your house to run business with you as a partner but ask you to pay rent for the use of your own house?
Despite all this, people of XOLOBENI will bear all the costs of mining. This will be dry sand mining; therefore dust will be flying around affecting them, their grazing land. Their underground water will be sucked up and used in the process. They will lose some of their grazing land and crop land. Estuaries will also suffer the consequences. If you want to understand more of the consequences you do not have to go too far, but to Richards Bay in KZN.
It is good for the so called ‘educated’ (me and you) to support development but of most important is to make sure that the people who live on the land are given fair hearing as they will end up bearing all the costs of those development projects. The people who are pushing for mining at XOLOBENI have chosen to ignore the people who leave on the land; this is not only unfair but illegal. Can you imagine if that was being done to you parents? How would you feel? “The land belongs to all who live in it!!!”
Regards
Sinegugu